Posts Tagged ‘corridor’

Transit Study Open House #2 Report

2009-10-21

MPO LOGO_smallYesterday was the second CR Transit Study open house, where the consultants revealed the options they came up with from all of our feedback. I went to the afternoon slot and about 10 other people also checked out the boards while I was there. I’m going to go into detail about several of the proposals, and having the boards from this open house will be helpful. Check them out here.

Each route had 1-3 options showing what they called “minimal” changes and “moderate” changes. As expected, there was no major overhaul of the current system, but instead, logical recommendations based on the ridership statistics presented at the first open house.  Routes like 4 and 10 barely had any changes, and I tended to agree with that. We noted some of the positives of Route 4 during the bus party, mostly surrounding the direct path and the opportunity to catch a bus going out or back after a short 30 minute grocery stop. I heard one participant comment about still wanting direct Edgewood and Blairs Ferry routes, but I believe those changes can wait a bit longer, as in 5-10 years as the transit system (hopefully) grows in a planned manner.

Not all routes were left intact. Routes 1, 2, 3, 5B, and 7 all had major changes as one of the modification options. The consultants had two variations of a “moderate” change for Route 1. Both removed the north “hump” along Ellis Blvd, since the ridership has obviously been affected by the flooding in that area. Option A then has the route going bi-directionally along O Ave. and then down Edgewood to turn around at Westdale Mall. Option B creates a loop out on F Ave and back along O Ave. I prefer Option A because it provides a new north-south connection along Edgewood and connects to Westdale which could act as a hub outside of downtown. I also like that Route 1 would cross Routes 8, 10, and connect with 12 at Westdale. Timing, initially, may not be ideal for transfers to and from these other routes, but if the connection points exist, transferring becomes more realistic as route frequencies increase. And until then, there is still the option of connecting to Routes 10 or 12 at Westdale without waiting downtown.

Moving to Route 2, its moderate modification removed the entire route section north of Mount Vernon Rd. This change would let Route 2 be bidirectional along Mount Vernon Rd until Memorial Dr. and allow for 40 minute route runs. Route 9 and 2 are currently almost the same routes, just traveled in opposite directions, so the area dropped in Route 2 would still be covered fairly well by 9. During the Route 2 Bus Party, we talked quite a bit about how the route seemed to wander around and it was confusing as to what the purpose was. I think trimming this route and making it more direct will help define it’s purpose, plus allow for a functional frequency.

Here I’m skipping to Route 7 which serves south Cedar Rapids out to Kirkwood. I had the pleasure of talking with a Kirkwood employee at the first open house and she clearly explained why the current Route 7 bus service is not popular with students. Right now the route makes a huge loop that goes through campus, out to C St. and connects with Bowling St at 41st Ave Dr SW. If a student gets on the route at a Kirkwood campus apartment to go to class, the only way back to their apartment is via downtown Cedar Rapids. Who in their right mind would do that? The moderate route modification would have the bus turn around at Aegon on C St. SW and then back track along the same path. I just can’t disagree with this change, it’s too logical.

Now to 5B. I changed my mind on these options during the open house, and as I’m reviewing the changes again, I may flip once more. This is tough. Both options are trying to decrease the “loop dee loo” going on with the current setup, but there are a lot of factors in play with this route and Route 3 as we’ll see in a bit. The minimal route change would remove the section along Blairs Ferry Rd. -> Center Point Rd. -> Robins Rd. until Boyson. This would create a bidirectional route from downtown to the corner of Boyson and Robins Rd, then an end loop that goes from Boyson to Center Point Rd, north to Tower Terrace Rd. and back south along Robins Rd. to Boyson again. I completely agree with the bidirectional section. As this is my back-up route, it can be a long ride home even if it’s my best option.

The moderate modification removes the end loop along Robins Rd, Tower Terrace, and Center Point. Here it would follow the current “lower loop” along Blairs Ferry Rd, Center Point Rd, Robins Rd, Boyson Rd, and C Ave. This would shorten the route time and cover the main area, but leave a large hole in the growing business area in north Hiawatha. There is also a direction change suggestion where the morning route would go one direction around that loop, and at some point during the day, the route would switch and follow the other direction of the route. I didn’t ask for a reason on this because I actually missed that detail at first. Unless there is an exceptional reason for this, I don’t think it’s a good idea. We need simpler routes, not more details to remember. I’m pretty sure I marked the minimal option as my preference at the open house, but I’m changing my mind again for the moderate option without the AM/PM direction switch, because it has a better focus on a core area that is used. This decision is also based on Route 3 decisions below.

Ah, Route 3. This is my daily route and the two options presented are probably among the most minimal and most drastic of the bunch. I’ll start with the minimal modifications. This would potentially remove the section north of Blairs Ferry that goes by the Post Office and behind Target, and reroutes it along Blairs Ferry. I currently get on along this path, but I’m a rare rider that will seek out the bus (within my odd definition of reason), so if this section is cut I’ll be inconvenienced, but not ticked off. It also “undoes” the change made earlier this year to take the route along 32nd St by Rockwell’s building. I have never seen someone get on or off along this section, so I can see why.

Now onto the moderate change option. This would completely remove Route 3, see I told you it was drastic! The reasoning is that there are 3 other routes (4, 6, and 5B)  that serve an area close to 3, so they could pick up the current service. This is where tightly linked “if” statements apply to make the resulting transit service effective. I mentioned that I was up in the air about Route 5B, and that is largely because I found that changing one without paying attention to what the other was covering could cause large, important areas to go unserved. Right now the northern section of Route 3 serves people going to work at Wehrenberg Theaters, Goodwill, and Rockwell, and people going to the Post Office, Target, and BioLife, along with people who may live close. Removing Route 3 would remove immediate access (right across the street or right outside) to Wehrenberg, Goodwill, the Post Office, BioLife, and Rockwell. Target has Route 5B along Blairs Ferry. Ok, so we use Route 5B to fill in access to these location since Blairs Ferry is roughly two blocks south of this section. That leaves Rockwell’s current stop as a hole not served by another route, so employees would have to use Route 5B along Blairs Ferry and maybe walk a bit farther. Now we’ve removed Route 3, so the only way this plan works and still covers the Route 3 locations is for Route 5B to use the moderate option because it maintains the Blairs Ferry Rd. section. If that section is removed, there is not a good way for riders to access the Route 3 void. This change would also mean that frequency would go from 60 minutes to 80 minutes for this area, making it less useful for many of the professionals using Route 3 to get to work downtown. This is where I’d have to start backing off on my use because my life schedule can only handle so much waiting and planning.

So removing Route 3 (moderate) should lead to choosing the moderate 5B changes, and choosing the minimal Route 5B option should lead to choosing the minimal Route 3 modification so that important areas continue to be served.

That is probably more than most of you care to consume at one time, but hopefully reading these thoughts with the route boards at hand will make everything more clear. I would love to hear what others though of the open house, especially if you were able to hear the presentation at the evening time, and share your opinions on the changes. Are you excited? Angry? Would some of the changes help you start riding or make it worse for you? Remember to take a look at the boards here and send your comments to the Corridor MPO here if you weren’t able to attend or thought of more ideas. All responses would be most helpful if they are in by October 27th, so responses can be accounted for before the final open house.

The third and final Transit Study open house will be on November 24th with further details yet to be announced. Mark your calendars!

Blog Action Day – Climate Change

2009-10-15

Today is Blog Action Day, and this year’s topic is Climate Change. This is right up the Bus Party alley since transportation is one of the biggest impacts on our environment! Even though I started riding the bus out of convenience, I feel good knowing that I’m keeping one more, single rider car out of traffic. For every person who chooses an alternative form of transportation, we have less pollution, less congestion, and less wear and tear on our roads, which saves us money, too and I don’t know anyone who isn’t for that.

Public transportation also promotes a change in health. Walking a block or more to a bus stop instead of a few steps to your car is a great way to get light exercise with a purpose. I was chatting with a fellow, regular rider who shared that she has noticed a slight difference in her health since she moved closer to a bus stop and sometimes wishes that she still had to walk a quarter of a mile, although not once winter rolls around. Pairing bikes with the bus system is also a good way to get exercise, cover more area, and reduce the amount of emissions in the air.

A well planned transit system benefits local economic development and land use. The Midwest is notorious for sprawl because we have the room, but think of how many more residential and commercial development opportunities there would be if we didn’t have to spend so much space on vast parking wastelands. To get a better idea of what I’m talking about, check out Brady Dorman’s figure ground diagram of the Collins/1st Ave area at Urban Thinking. There could definitely be a better use of space there.

But layouts like this are exactly why people need to have cars, so what are we to do? Start small to make a big impact. Take a bus or other alternative transportation once a week. Move up to two days a week, and then try a whole day. Could you go a whole weekend without driving? What about one week every year? Every month? If you like a good challenge, see how far you can go and you might start to see less money going into your gas tank and smell cleaner air from others trying the same changes!

Climate change can be a hot topic, but there are some things you can’t argue with: less road repair, cleaner air, better land use, and healthier citizens. Now check out what other blogs have to say on Blog Action Day!

Funding From More than Riders

2009-10-06

On August 24th the bus fares for Cedar Rapids Transit increased as part of the city of Cedar Rapids’ fiscal year 2010 budget. At the first Transit Study Open House, I learned that Cedar Rapids now charges rates above the national average. A single route, one way trip is $1.25 and transferring is $2.50 for the general public in Cedar Rapids. The national averages are $1.16 and $1.68, respectively. This is irritating for some, but a real burden for many of the riders who depend on the transit system.

Bob Bourne of Bourne Transit is one of the consultants for the transit study, and seems to know the ins and outs of running a transit system (he did spend 25 years improving CyRide in Ames). He said that the most successful transit systems are in states with strong state backing, but Iowa isn’t there yet. We need public transit to become a higher priority so adequate funding can flow down. This would help improve public transportation in our state and distribute more of the load to the government instead of the citizens. Given the billions of dollars that go into roadway infrastructure each year, more money could be diverted to public transit, encouraging more people to use it and help lessen the wear and tear on our streets.

Iowa has started to dive further into passenger rail, which is a good sign, but now we need systems to get those riders to their local destination once they arrive on a train. Many discussions about commuter routes between Iowa City and Cedar Rapids bring up the problem of local bus systems once people arrive in the cities. Right now it would not practical for someone to use a fixed transit system to commute from Iowa City to Cedar Rapids unless they worked near where the Cedar Rapids drop off was located. That means we need to work now to improve the local systems if we truly want to move toward a better connected corridor. As usual, this requires money, but most importantly it requires backing from citizens. If you’d like to see public transit move up the priority ladder, make sure you let those representing you know.

You can find your representatives here and here. I’m not into writing the pre-made letters yet, so I’ll just suggest letting them know you care about public transportation in Iowa. A quick email is all it takes to start climbing the ladder.

Corridor, Chicago, and Beyond

2009-09-13

I’m curious, so I’d appreciate some participation on this one even if it’s months after it’s posted.

The current administration is putting some focus on public transit, largely in the form of financial support for passenger rail. Illinois and Iowa have signed a Memorandum of Agreement, making rail between Chicago, the Quad Cities, and Iowa City a solid candidate for funding. Iowa City is already making steps to prepare for passenger rail into their city by selecting a site for the depot.

It’s a bummer that Cedar Rapids isn’t currently positioned for our own direct link to Chicago, but I guess we can be slightly consoled that a connection will be close. In light of this, I’m wondering how many people would take advantage of this and if public transit from Cedar Rapids to Iowa City should be involved. It certainly seems like a transit connection from passenger rail in Iowa City to Cedar Rapids would help bring the visitors up north, but would citizens in Cedar Rapids, and south to Iowa City, also use a bus or light rail system to get to Iowa City?

I know there are stipulations involved in my own choice to use such a system. Things like frequency, how late it runs, cost, trip length, and stop locations. If this is something others in the area are interested in, then I think it at least warrants discussions between the corridor cities so we can make decisions, about depot designs for example, that can integrate the area and take full advantage of the infrastructure headed our way.

Take the poll to provide some rough data and feel free to leave a comment with more details about your own stipulations and thoughts.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 58 other followers