Archive for the ‘Thoughts’ Category

Winter Busing

2009-12-20

Winter is my absolute favorite time of year to ride the bus anywhere that gets below 40 degrees (F)! I’m even more thrilled to let someone else chauffeur me around town when it snows like it did in Iowa last week. So as the year comes to an end, and it’s most definitely winter weather time, I thought I’d share my reasons and some winter busing tips.

Why Winter Busing is awesome:

  1. I don’t have to drive with people who suck at driving even more with bad road conditions.
  2. The bus is nice and toasty.
  3. I don’t have to dig my car out to go to work and again to go home.
  4. I’m not worried about someone running into the bus.
  5. Total time spent in the cold each day (minus walking to lunch) = ~5 minutes
  6. The buses don’t quit when the weather gets tough. Although I suppose this could be a negative if you like excuses to not go in to work.

Tips for Winter Busing:

  1. Wear tall boots for scaling snow piles until they’re cleared.
  2. A sturdy bag to carry normal shoes in. Also remember to grab the bag or you get to wear your boots all day.
    1. Might want to include “nice looking” in #1 in case you forget your shoes like I tend to do.
  3. Bring tissues if your nose leaks like mine going between hot and cold temps.
  4. Use the front door whenever possible, so you don’t exit directly into a snow bank.
  5. Don’t sit across from a door. The bus is warm, but the wind can be quite brisk when the doors open.

Do you have any other bus benefits you love during the winter? Or any tips you’ve learned? Please share in the comments, I’d love to hear!

Transit Study Open House #3 Report

2009-11-27

Today’s guest post was written by Brady Dorman. Brady is an architecture student at Iowa State University and posts about architecture, urbanism, and transit on Urban Thinking. He is also a driver for CyRide and we asked him to share his report on the third and final CR Transit Study Open House.

The third and final CR Transit Study open house was held this past Tuesday, where the consultants presented final recommendations for route changes and improvements. The final route changes proposed are a combination of “minimal” and “moderate” modification options that were presented at the second open house in October. These initial changes are focused on improving legibility and efficiency of each route without significantly increasing cost. The consultants also provided system recommendations for marketing, operations, infrastructure and fleet, finances, and future planning.

For Route 1, the consultants recommended the “moderate” modification presented at the second open house. This removes the northern “hump” segment along Ellis Blvd. that goes by Ellis Park and adds service on Edgewood Rd. all the way to Westdale Mall. By straightening indirect segments the entire route is simplified, providing bi-directional service the entire length. From the Time Check neighborhood, the route runs along Ellis Blvd. to O Ave. to Edgewood, to Westdale Mall where the bus turns around. The modified route would provide a consistent frequency of 60 minutes all day.

Recommended changes to routes 2 and 9, which serve Mt. Vernon Road and the SE quadrant, make them the exact same route with Route 9 running in a clockwise direction and Route 2 counter-clockwise. The current routes operate much the same way, but deviate from each other along certain segments. The pairing of these routes and elimination of lowest ridership segments will make transit easier to use in the SE quadrant with more direct service in both directions. Route 9, the clockwise loop, is proposed to run only during peak periods with five trips per day at 60 minute frequency. Route 2 will run all day long with 60 minute service.

Route 3 riders can relax now, as the “moderate” modification that eliminated the entire route is not being recommended. Instead Route 3 will go with the minimal modification option, which simply makes the route more direct. A short section north of Blairs Ferry that runs behind the Post Office and Target is removed, as well as the Eastern Ave. loop between 27th and 32nd streets that was implemented not more than a year ago. An outbound section along Grande Ave. is also eliminated, so the route will run on 3rd Ave outbound all the way to 19th Street. Modified route will have 60 minute service all day.

Recommended changes to Route 4 are very minimal, removing a short segment on Hollywood Blvd. and Regent Street NE. Instead the route will run along Oakland Rd. to 42nd Street via a short section of Golf Street. This minor change will provide additional direct service to the Noelridge Park Pool, in addition to Route 3 that operates along 42nd and Council streets. The modified Route 4 will provide 60 minute service all day.

All changes to routes 5B, 5N, and 5S are proposed beyond Lindale Mall, where the three routes split from 1st Ave. Generally segments with very low ridership are removed to increase peak cycle time of each route to 80 minutes from 90 minutes.

On Route 5B, which serves northern Cedar Rapids and Hiawatha, the Tower Terrace Rd. loop is removed. The remaining “lower loop” along Blairs Ferry Rd, Center Point Rd, Robins Rd, Boyson Rd, and C Ave operates in a clockwise direction, without the AM/PM directional shift as initially proposed at open house 2.

In Marion, 5N is simplified into a counter-clockwise loop along McGowen Blvd. between 44th Street and 10th Street. The 29th Ave / Alburnett Rd. loop is removed, as well as a section along 8th Ave. Route 5S remains mostly the same with a simple counter-clockwise loop through south Marion, but now turns around at 31st Street, instead of going all the way out to Walmart.

The addition of a fourth bus running on the 5’s during peak allows a combined service frequency of 20 minutes between downtown and Lindale, and individual route frequency of 60 minutes. For instance, if 5B departs downtown at 4:00, 5N leaves at 4:20, 5S leaves at 4:40, then the extra bus starts a new trip of 5B from downtown at 5:00, before the original 5B bus returns. That 5B would then start a 5N trip at 5:20. So during peak time service, each bus would actually rotate between the three different routes instead of doing the same route over and over as they do now. Individual route frequency would resort to 90 minutes during midday, as to provide consistent 30 minute departures from downtown.

These changes to the 5’s are good initial steps to improving legibility and efficiency along these routes. The increased peak frequency is great, but hopefully it can be increased for the entire day in the near future – at least on weekdays. Twenty minute service all day between downtown and Lindale seems reasonable, given the consistent high ridership along this corridor, and then 5N and 5S through Marion would provide 60 minute service through Marion all day instead of reverting to 90 minutes during midday. However, it is understandable that to implement these initial changes right away, they cannot increase operational or overhead costs.

Modifications to Route 6 primarily affect service in Hiawatha. The Miller Rd. / Boyson Rd. loop is removed, but a smaller outbound loop on Emmons Street is maintained. Blairs Ferry Rd. gains bi-directional service between Walmart and Edgewood, where a new endpoint loop improves service to new commercial development around HyVee. The new route will have 60 minute frequency and 30 minute peak service.

Recommendations for Route 7 turn it into a bi-directional route, greatly improving service to Kirkwood Community College. Currently the route makes a huge loop that goes through campus, out to C Street. and reconnects with Bowling St. at 41st Ave Dr SW. If a student gets on the route at a campus apartment to go to class, the only way back to their apartment is via downtown. The modifications eliminate the loop and have the route turn around at AEGON / Yellowbook, providing service through campus in both directions. Closer to downtown, the route is shifted from C Street in Czech Village (picked up by Route 12) over to J Street until it reconnects with Bowling Street at 33rd Ave SW. Modified Route 7 is 60 minute all day frequency and 30 minute peak service.

Changes to Route 8 improve legibility and bi-directional service by simplifying the redundant and confusing looping segments that currently exist on the western end. One loop at the end between West Post and Stony Point roads provides service to and from Taft Middle School to students living along the route east or west of the school. Modified route has 60 minute service all day.

Changes to Route 10 are very minimal, only removing a short loop section between 1st Ave. and Johnson Ave. Otherwise this route remains as a fairly simple loop route serving Westdale Mall and Jefferson High School. Modified route has a proposed 60 minute frequency with 30 minute peak service.

Modifications recommended for Route 11 are actually quite substantial. Service along J Street SW between 16th and 33rd avenues is removed, but picked up by the new Route 7. This creates a new straight shot along 6th Street SW all the way from 8th Ave to Wright Brothers Blvd, with the exception of a two-block deviation at 29th Ave. Service is maintained at the airport, which was added after the flood when intercity buses began using the terminal. Service to College Community Schools is reduced to a 3 times per day route deviation from 6th Street to Prairie directly along 76th Ave. This change was a major concern for a few Prairie teachers and students who were at the earlier open house session. The modified route will have 60 minute all day frequency and 30 minute peak service.

And finally, Route 12. This route becomes much more bi-directional along Wilson Ave. Segments along 8th Ave and 6th Street SW are removed (picked up by Route 11), and replaced by a segment along C Street through Czech Village to Wilson Ave, which was removed from Route 7. A large clockwise loop around the Westdale area is simplified. The modified route has 60 minutes frequency all day.

Some interesting numbers were provided at the open house. With the route modifications, total route mileage decrease from 220.9 to 205.8, but total daily trips actually increase from 194 to 213. The number of peak buses is reduced from 21 to 20, but with the increase of trips total daily miles increases from 2990 to 3113. I was told these numbers will be adjusted slightly, but in general they show that service is being increased while minimizing increases in overhead and operational costs (i.e. same number of drivers, same amount of time on the clock).

Except for the 5’s, all route cycle times are reduced to a neat 60 minutes, from the previous 70 minute afternoon cycles. To recap, routes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 10 will operate at 60 minute frequencies all day. Route 9 will operate at 60 minute frequency during the morning and afternoon peak period. Routes 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12 will all maintain their current 30 minute peak service.

In addition to route changes, the consultants also made system recommendations. I’m particularly pleased with their recommendations for marketing and operations, which include:

  • Improve the overall appearance of schedule and route information
  • Produce a new system map
  • Improve website with trip planner providing origin-destination capabilities
  • Provide real-time bus arrival information for cell phone or computer users
  • Develop monthly newsletter for passengers and use Twitter for immediate detour announcements

Other recommendations were provided for the system fleet, bus stop infrastructure, finances, and future planning. Recommendations for fleet are:

  • Provide destination signs with route number, route name, and destination on all buses
  • Pursue earmark for 12 new low floor buses
  • Install improved public address system on all buses
  • Evaluate cost of automatic voice enunciator system

These are all issues that clearly need addressing at CR Transit. The next step is City Council approval and implementation by CR Transit. The changes proposed were designed to be able to implement right away as a first step to improving transit service in Cedar Rapids. I look forward to seeing these changes take place.

Update: The final report is posted here.

Des Moines Employer Supported Transit

2009-11-18

DMDARTThe Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority (DART) is the transit organization that runs the Des Moines buses. They’ve had some negative publicity about hitting pedestrians lately, but it looks like they have some great services going on. Side note: I wouldn’t recommend using it, but I do enjoy my local friend’s slogan “you can’t get hit by us if you’re riding on us”. It’s funny, you know it. Anyway, I was checking out their programs page and discovered that there are around 50 organizations (35 listed on the site) that currently support employee transit benefits to varying degrees! I am jealous.

I wrote about this in Cedar Rapids, wondering how many people would be interested, but perhaps it would be better to start with the employers. The DART site does a good job of listing benefits for employers who choose to support transit through subsidized fares, and I’d add the benefit of publicity for those employers. It’s an additional perk for employees, plus it helps the community with things like congestion and air quality which can help foster a good feeling toward the company. I’m obviously a big supporter for this type of program and I truly believe it’s worth it for employers to provide this.

I am starting to look at other transit systems in cities of comparative size or location to look for easy improvements for Cedar Rapids. While the DART site isn’t the most gorgeous website ever, I do appreciate the level of detail they seem to be sharing. I love the idea of pages dedicated to new riders and how those pages walk a rider through the basics. I also like that they have a ton of information (ton means significantly more than CR provides) about how to use a bike with the bus system. Has anyone out there used DART to know if these pages are helpful in practice? How about other transit systems’ programs or sites. What do you like that could be added in Cedar Rapids?

CR Transit Route Redesign by Urban Thinking

2009-10-26

This summer I met Brady, an architecture student at Iowa State University. Not only is he a cool dude, but he also rode my bus route and has some good ideas about urban design. Brady decided to try his hand at redesigning the CR Transit routes (discussed here) and his result can be seen here. He also shared comments after the second open house and talked a bit more about his route design thoughts here.

Earlier this week we saw the big reveal of recommendations for the transit study, so I thought it would be fun to share Brady’s ideas and think about how they might work. I like both sets of ideas because I think they cover short term and long term planning. The transit study changes can be quickly implemented to improve our current system, while Brady’s clean slate design shows where we could go in a few years to potentially fix some of the current downfalls that can’t be fixed with band-aids.

Brady’s coverage looks good, and I like the looks of combining more, smaller hub and spoke system elements with a few linear routes as connectors. I did my personal test where I figure out how I would get to my usual destinations from my home. I like that there are more northern routes, closer to my house, but I would have to transfer once or twice to get to work downtown. I don’t know that this would be bad if the transfer timing was right, but it would interrupt my usual book reading. A new benefit would be that I could transfer on the north side of town and get to the Lindale area without going through downtown or catching an infrequent bus (note, I’m assuming the routes would be more frequent in this scenario since that is a basic need to improve to this point and gather the ridership to back this kind of change). I could also visit most of my friends, run several errands, and go out to eat without making a downtown “pit stop” when it doesn’t make sense. With Edgewood, 33rd, Boyson, Blairs Ferry, and 1st Ave linear routes, you can travel around the city about as directly as driving. Brady mentioned that he found it hard to cover the west side of Cedar Rapids and the Marion area, but I’ll throw East Post Rd. out there as a contender for a Marion and east Cedar Rapids connector. There could be a stretch along Boyson, one to Lindale, and then a southern connection to cover that area.

In order for us to reach a point where we could really start looking at this level of a system shift, we would need the changes currently being prepared to help increase awareness and ridership. We would also need to get to a point where we’re able to handle more frequent service, and start employing timing models or staff dedicated to figuring how to make transfers seamless or at least painless. We aren’t there yet, but I, as Brady also stated, don’t want Cedar Rapids to stop with this first study. It is just a stepping stone in a long path of continual improvements to truly make our metro area a vibrant center, so don’t stop sharing ideas once the first round of changes is approved. Keep pushing for a better system.

Thanks to Brady for posting his ideas!

Better Schedule Tool for CR

2009-10-23

I have spoken about how improving CR Transit‘s current schedule format could make the bus experience better by moving away from using multiple files to provide the information we need. The holy grail, for me, would be Google Transit, showing users where to go on a map and telling them the times in a way they can easily read.  There has been a lot of transit improvement focus lately in Cedar Rapids, but over a year and a half ago, fellow bus rider Ryan, from Thoughts Abound, created a step in the right direction. He wrote an app available on the web (Firefox and Safari browsers) that wraps the disconnected schedule data in a neat package.

CRbus Main Screen

CRbus Main Screen

It’s called CRbus and it provides the same basic information found in CR Transit’s PDFs, but in a much easier, and quicker, format to consume. He updates it as soon as he can after he’s aware of any schedule changes, so it stays up to date. New riders may still need to open the transit maps if they aren’t familiar with a route, but at least this is only two open resources! I think it comes in handy for frequent users that may need to use a familiar route at a different time, or do a quick time check to make sure they aren’t late. I personally need to start using it to check when the route 5 buses arrive at Lindale since I never seem to remember their time schedules.

Give CRbus a try and let us know if it lowers the barrier to riding the Cedar Rapids bus system or if it improves your current bus riding experience!

Transit Study Open House #2 Report

2009-10-21

MPO LOGO_smallYesterday was the second CR Transit Study open house, where the consultants revealed the options they came up with from all of our feedback. I went to the afternoon slot and about 10 other people also checked out the boards while I was there. I’m going to go into detail about several of the proposals, and having the boards from this open house will be helpful. Check them out here.

Each route had 1-3 options showing what they called “minimal” changes and “moderate” changes. As expected, there was no major overhaul of the current system, but instead, logical recommendations based on the ridership statistics presented at the first open house.  Routes like 4 and 10 barely had any changes, and I tended to agree with that. We noted some of the positives of Route 4 during the bus party, mostly surrounding the direct path and the opportunity to catch a bus going out or back after a short 30 minute grocery stop. I heard one participant comment about still wanting direct Edgewood and Blairs Ferry routes, but I believe those changes can wait a bit longer, as in 5-10 years as the transit system (hopefully) grows in a planned manner.

Not all routes were left intact. Routes 1, 2, 3, 5B, and 7 all had major changes as one of the modification options. The consultants had two variations of a “moderate” change for Route 1. Both removed the north “hump” along Ellis Blvd, since the ridership has obviously been affected by the flooding in that area. Option A then has the route going bi-directionally along O Ave. and then down Edgewood to turn around at Westdale Mall. Option B creates a loop out on F Ave and back along O Ave. I prefer Option A because it provides a new north-south connection along Edgewood and connects to Westdale which could act as a hub outside of downtown. I also like that Route 1 would cross Routes 8, 10, and connect with 12 at Westdale. Timing, initially, may not be ideal for transfers to and from these other routes, but if the connection points exist, transferring becomes more realistic as route frequencies increase. And until then, there is still the option of connecting to Routes 10 or 12 at Westdale without waiting downtown.

Moving to Route 2, its moderate modification removed the entire route section north of Mount Vernon Rd. This change would let Route 2 be bidirectional along Mount Vernon Rd until Memorial Dr. and allow for 40 minute route runs. Route 9 and 2 are currently almost the same routes, just traveled in opposite directions, so the area dropped in Route 2 would still be covered fairly well by 9. During the Route 2 Bus Party, we talked quite a bit about how the route seemed to wander around and it was confusing as to what the purpose was. I think trimming this route and making it more direct will help define it’s purpose, plus allow for a functional frequency.

Here I’m skipping to Route 7 which serves south Cedar Rapids out to Kirkwood. I had the pleasure of talking with a Kirkwood employee at the first open house and she clearly explained why the current Route 7 bus service is not popular with students. Right now the route makes a huge loop that goes through campus, out to C St. and connects with Bowling St at 41st Ave Dr SW. If a student gets on the route at a Kirkwood campus apartment to go to class, the only way back to their apartment is via downtown Cedar Rapids. Who in their right mind would do that? The moderate route modification would have the bus turn around at Aegon on C St. SW and then back track along the same path. I just can’t disagree with this change, it’s too logical.

Now to 5B. I changed my mind on these options during the open house, and as I’m reviewing the changes again, I may flip once more. This is tough. Both options are trying to decrease the “loop dee loo” going on with the current setup, but there are a lot of factors in play with this route and Route 3 as we’ll see in a bit. The minimal route change would remove the section along Blairs Ferry Rd. -> Center Point Rd. -> Robins Rd. until Boyson. This would create a bidirectional route from downtown to the corner of Boyson and Robins Rd, then an end loop that goes from Boyson to Center Point Rd, north to Tower Terrace Rd. and back south along Robins Rd. to Boyson again. I completely agree with the bidirectional section. As this is my back-up route, it can be a long ride home even if it’s my best option.

The moderate modification removes the end loop along Robins Rd, Tower Terrace, and Center Point. Here it would follow the current “lower loop” along Blairs Ferry Rd, Center Point Rd, Robins Rd, Boyson Rd, and C Ave. This would shorten the route time and cover the main area, but leave a large hole in the growing business area in north Hiawatha. There is also a direction change suggestion where the morning route would go one direction around that loop, and at some point during the day, the route would switch and follow the other direction of the route. I didn’t ask for a reason on this because I actually missed that detail at first. Unless there is an exceptional reason for this, I don’t think it’s a good idea. We need simpler routes, not more details to remember. I’m pretty sure I marked the minimal option as my preference at the open house, but I’m changing my mind again for the moderate option without the AM/PM direction switch, because it has a better focus on a core area that is used. This decision is also based on Route 3 decisions below.

Ah, Route 3. This is my daily route and the two options presented are probably among the most minimal and most drastic of the bunch. I’ll start with the minimal modifications. This would potentially remove the section north of Blairs Ferry that goes by the Post Office and behind Target, and reroutes it along Blairs Ferry. I currently get on along this path, but I’m a rare rider that will seek out the bus (within my odd definition of reason), so if this section is cut I’ll be inconvenienced, but not ticked off. It also “undoes” the change made earlier this year to take the route along 32nd St by Rockwell’s building. I have never seen someone get on or off along this section, so I can see why.

Now onto the moderate change option. This would completely remove Route 3, see I told you it was drastic! The reasoning is that there are 3 other routes (4, 6, and 5B)  that serve an area close to 3, so they could pick up the current service. This is where tightly linked “if” statements apply to make the resulting transit service effective. I mentioned that I was up in the air about Route 5B, and that is largely because I found that changing one without paying attention to what the other was covering could cause large, important areas to go unserved. Right now the northern section of Route 3 serves people going to work at Wehrenberg Theaters, Goodwill, and Rockwell, and people going to the Post Office, Target, and BioLife, along with people who may live close. Removing Route 3 would remove immediate access (right across the street or right outside) to Wehrenberg, Goodwill, the Post Office, BioLife, and Rockwell. Target has Route 5B along Blairs Ferry. Ok, so we use Route 5B to fill in access to these location since Blairs Ferry is roughly two blocks south of this section. That leaves Rockwell’s current stop as a hole not served by another route, so employees would have to use Route 5B along Blairs Ferry and maybe walk a bit farther. Now we’ve removed Route 3, so the only way this plan works and still covers the Route 3 locations is for Route 5B to use the moderate option because it maintains the Blairs Ferry Rd. section. If that section is removed, there is not a good way for riders to access the Route 3 void. This change would also mean that frequency would go from 60 minutes to 80 minutes for this area, making it less useful for many of the professionals using Route 3 to get to work downtown. This is where I’d have to start backing off on my use because my life schedule can only handle so much waiting and planning.

So removing Route 3 (moderate) should lead to choosing the moderate 5B changes, and choosing the minimal Route 5B option should lead to choosing the minimal Route 3 modification so that important areas continue to be served.

That is probably more than most of you care to consume at one time, but hopefully reading these thoughts with the route boards at hand will make everything more clear. I would love to hear what others though of the open house, especially if you were able to hear the presentation at the evening time, and share your opinions on the changes. Are you excited? Angry? Would some of the changes help you start riding or make it worse for you? Remember to take a look at the boards here and send your comments to the Corridor MPO here if you weren’t able to attend or thought of more ideas. All responses would be most helpful if they are in by October 27th, so responses can be accounted for before the final open house.

The third and final Transit Study open house will be on November 24th with further details yet to be announced. Mark your calendars!

Blog Action Day – Climate Change

2009-10-15

Today is Blog Action Day, and this year’s topic is Climate Change. This is right up the Bus Party alley since transportation is one of the biggest impacts on our environment! Even though I started riding the bus out of convenience, I feel good knowing that I’m keeping one more, single rider car out of traffic. For every person who chooses an alternative form of transportation, we have less pollution, less congestion, and less wear and tear on our roads, which saves us money, too and I don’t know anyone who isn’t for that.

Public transportation also promotes a change in health. Walking a block or more to a bus stop instead of a few steps to your car is a great way to get light exercise with a purpose. I was chatting with a fellow, regular rider who shared that she has noticed a slight difference in her health since she moved closer to a bus stop and sometimes wishes that she still had to walk a quarter of a mile, although not once winter rolls around. Pairing bikes with the bus system is also a good way to get exercise, cover more area, and reduce the amount of emissions in the air.

A well planned transit system benefits local economic development and land use. The Midwest is notorious for sprawl because we have the room, but think of how many more residential and commercial development opportunities there would be if we didn’t have to spend so much space on vast parking wastelands. To get a better idea of what I’m talking about, check out Brady Dorman’s figure ground diagram of the Collins/1st Ave area at Urban Thinking. There could definitely be a better use of space there.

But layouts like this are exactly why people need to have cars, so what are we to do? Start small to make a big impact. Take a bus or other alternative transportation once a week. Move up to two days a week, and then try a whole day. Could you go a whole weekend without driving? What about one week every year? Every month? If you like a good challenge, see how far you can go and you might start to see less money going into your gas tank and smell cleaner air from others trying the same changes!

Climate change can be a hot topic, but there are some things you can’t argue with: less road repair, cleaner air, better land use, and healthier citizens. Now check out what other blogs have to say on Blog Action Day!

Funding From More than Riders

2009-10-06

On August 24th the bus fares for Cedar Rapids Transit increased as part of the city of Cedar Rapids’ fiscal year 2010 budget. At the first Transit Study Open House, I learned that Cedar Rapids now charges rates above the national average. A single route, one way trip is $1.25 and transferring is $2.50 for the general public in Cedar Rapids. The national averages are $1.16 and $1.68, respectively. This is irritating for some, but a real burden for many of the riders who depend on the transit system.

Bob Bourne of Bourne Transit is one of the consultants for the transit study, and seems to know the ins and outs of running a transit system (he did spend 25 years improving CyRide in Ames). He said that the most successful transit systems are in states with strong state backing, but Iowa isn’t there yet. We need public transit to become a higher priority so adequate funding can flow down. This would help improve public transportation in our state and distribute more of the load to the government instead of the citizens. Given the billions of dollars that go into roadway infrastructure each year, more money could be diverted to public transit, encouraging more people to use it and help lessen the wear and tear on our streets.

Iowa has started to dive further into passenger rail, which is a good sign, but now we need systems to get those riders to their local destination once they arrive on a train. Many discussions about commuter routes between Iowa City and Cedar Rapids bring up the problem of local bus systems once people arrive in the cities. Right now it would not practical for someone to use a fixed transit system to commute from Iowa City to Cedar Rapids unless they worked near where the Cedar Rapids drop off was located. That means we need to work now to improve the local systems if we truly want to move toward a better connected corridor. As usual, this requires money, but most importantly it requires backing from citizens. If you’d like to see public transit move up the priority ladder, make sure you let those representing you know.

You can find your representatives here and here. I’m not into writing the pre-made letters yet, so I’ll just suggest letting them know you care about public transportation in Iowa. A quick email is all it takes to start climbing the ladder.

Bus Party on Iowa Pulic Radio

2009-10-01

Earlier this year Alex Heuer, from Iowa Public Radio, did a three part series on Transportation in Iowa. In the third segment, he talked about alternative transportation initiatives and included some interviews during the Route 2 Bus Party. Stream the audio or download his piece through Iowa Public Radio.

Thanks for taking time to join us Alex, and for spreading the word about alternative transportation in Iowa.

This and other Bus Party news appearances can be found on our links page. Check it out.

Transit Study Open House #1 Boards

2009-09-28

Hurrah, the open house boards were posted today! You can access the PDF here and dive into the data goodness.

The second page has stats from the survey conducted earlier this summer. I still can’t believe there were close to 800 respondents!

Page 3 has information about current CR Transit riders and the current fleet. You’ve probably heard that Cedar Rapids has one of the oldest fleets in the country, and now you have the proof. Standard bus life is 12 years or 500,000 miles. Even with the 4 brand new buses CR Transit received this year, most of the fleet should be considered beyond dead.

The rest of the file is maps, and I’m most interested in the “Productivity” and “Performance” maps on pages 7 and 8. These show which locations are used most heavily and where some rework can be done. Something important to note while looking at page 7 in particular, is that there was this big flood in 2008, so the large red and orange areas right next to the river won’t just be stripped out. More thought will need to go into how to handle access to the flood affected areas to balance current use, while (potentially) providing easy service increases as the areas recover.

Those are my thoughts, now share what you see in the data.

[PDF provided by the Corridor MPO]


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 58 other followers